An analysis of a rulers cruelty in the prince by niccolo machiavelli

This contrast with the inaction of the Florentines, who allowed internal conflict to develop in Pistoia, resulting in devastation of the city. Machiavelli gives a negative example in Emperor Maximilian I ; Maximilian, who was secretive, never consulted others, but once he ordered his plans and met dissent, he immediately changed them.

Machiavelli’s The Prince: Themes & Analysis

Ruin them, as Rome destroyed Carthageand also as Machiavelli says the Romans eventually had to do in Greece, even though they had wanted to avoid it. Yet at the same time, such a regime is weakened irredeemably, since it must depend upon foreigners to fight on its behalf. It can be summarized as follows: Machiavelli has a very low opinion of the people throughout history.

He uses this as justification for the use of fear in order to control people. He believes that when given the opportunity one must destroy completely, because if one does not he will certainly be destroyed.

Finally, regardless of the personal morality involved, the prince should be praised if he does good for the state and berated if he hurts the state. Machiavelli advises that a prince must frequently hunt in order to keep his body fit and learn the landscape surrounding his kingdom.

Pole reported that it was spoken of highly by his enemy Thomas Cromwell in England, and had influenced Henry VIII in his turn towards Protestantismand in his tactics, for example during the Pilgrimage of Grace.

People more often respond to fear than to compassion and thus a prince must endeavor at the very least to make his subjects fear him. The Prince purports to reflect the self-conscious political realism of an author who is fully aware—on the basis of direct experience with the Florentine government—that goodness and right are not sufficient to win and maintain political office.

He concludes that with so many wretched men around virtue is hard to create in oneself. He should be "armed" with his own arms. He hopes to reclaim the land which has been taken away from them. People will naturally feel a sense of obligation after receiving a favor or service, and this bond is usually not easily broken.

If you cannot be both loved and feared, then it is better to be feared than loved. If a prince is given to changing his mind, his reputation will suffer. In his view, whatever benefits may accrue to a state by denying a military role to the people are of less importance than the absence of liberty that necessarily accompanies such disarmament.

They all showed a defect of arms already discussed and either had a hostile populace or did not know to secure themselves with the great.

Niccolò Machiavelli

This disorder, if it produces some quiet times, is in time the cause of straitened circumstances, damage and irreparable ruin Machiavelli A prince cannot truly have these qualities because at times it is necessary to act against them.

The truth is Machiavelli is only being honest with what he has observed consistently in history to be true. Machiavelli also writes about how hard it must be for a prince to stay virtuous. Machiavelli thinks that other republican models such as those adopted by Sparta or Venice will produce weaker and less successful political systems, ones that are either stagnant or prone to decay when circumstances change.

It is precisely this moralistic view of authority that Machiavelli criticizes at length in his best-known treatise, The Prince.Much of The Prince is devoted to describing exactly what it means to conduct a good war: how to effectively fortify a city, how to treat subjects in newly acquired territories, and how to prevent domestic insurrection that would distract from a successful war.

But Machiavelli’s description of war encompasses more than just the direct use of. Machiavelli points out that image is as important as action, and that rulers must manipulate the perceptions of the populace to appear as other than who they really are.

A prince should eagerly take credit for successes and place responsibility for unpopular laws on the shoulders of.

Essay on Analysis of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli Words | 3 Pages "The Prince" by Niccolo Machiavelli is about the origination of a prince.

More or less how a prince can start from the bottom and become a great king or die at the feet of his people before reaching his prime.

The Prince Analysis Literary Devices in The Prince After The Prince was published, Machiavelli became so hated that he had a lot of "colorful" nicknames including the Devil's partner in crime and Murderous palmolive2day.com case you doubted that the Med Steaminess Rating.

Nada. Zip. Zero. Machiavelli even tells rulers to keep their hands. The Prince is an extended analysis of how to acquire and maintain political power. It includes 26 chapters and an opening dedication to Lorenzo de Medici. The dedication declares Machiavelli's intention to discuss in plain language the conduct of great men and the principles of princely government.

The Prince Quotes

The Prince is an extended analysis of how to acquire and maintain political power. It includes 26 chapters and an opening dedication to Lorenzo de Medici. The dedication declares Machiavelli's intention to discuss in plain language the conduct of great men and the principles of princely government.

Download
An analysis of a rulers cruelty in the prince by niccolo machiavelli
Rated 5/5 based on 18 review